USTA Home > News Home > Anticipated Florida Supreme Court slot machine ruling could ultimately prove meaningless

Anticipated Florida Supreme Court slot machine ruling could ultimately prove meaningless
Saturday, February 13, 2016 - from United Florida Horsemen

       Decrease Text Size    Increase Text Size   Print  Email

Hallandale Beach, FL --- While decoupling hangs in the balance, the general consensus around Florida's Capitol is that gambling expansion in Florida could depend on whether the Florida Supreme Court rules that pari-mutuel permit holders outside of Miami-Dade and Broward counties can have slot machines without legislative authorization.

But Sunshine State News Publisher Nancy Smith conjectured that would be " . . . like Wall Street saying 'We can't reverse the downward trend of the Dow until we get Bernie Madoff back.'"

She revealed in her column today the strange case of North Florida's "Hamilton Downs," a court hearing which is scheduled for March 7-9.

Given that the State of Florida said in its 2014 complaint that Hamilton's "flag drop" events  " . . . do not qualify as horse races," Smith explained that this raises the question of why the exact same events at nearby Gretna Racing LLC were not also singled out.

Thus, Smith said, the anticipated "Gretna Slots" Florida Supreme Court ruling could be " . . . as meaningless as a campaign promise blowing in the wind."

Read her game-changing "I Beg To Differ" column here.

Read the Florida Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering's complaint against Hamilton Downs here.
 


Related Articles :


     NEXT NEWSROOM ARTICLE
Colville elected new Standardbred Canada Chair

Search Articles: